Cardwell v. State

1956 OK CR 18, 293 P.2d 921, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 154
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 8, 1956
DocketA-12257
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1956 OK CR 18 (Cardwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardwell v. State, 1956 OK CR 18, 293 P.2d 921, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 154 (Okla. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

BRETT, Judge.

Eula Cardwell was charged by information in the County Court of Tillman County, Oklahoma, with the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of 37 O.S.1951 § 1, said offense having occurred on or about April 10, 1954. The defendant was tried by jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at a $50 fine and 30 days in jail.

The appeal was filed in this court on September 12, 1955 and the case was set for oral argument on January 18, 1956. No briefs have been filed and no appearance was made at the time the case was set for oral argument. Under such state of the record, pursuant to the rules of this court, the judgment and sentence will be affirmed unless such gross and fundamental error is found in the record that it would be unfair to affirm it. Gaston v. State, *922 Okl.Cr., 284 P.2d 436; Fitzgerald v. State, Okl.Cr., 283 P.2d 208.

Briefly, the facts in this case reveal that Sheriff Kilgore, of Tillman County, called for a taxicab at the Yellow Taxicab Company to bring him a pint of whiskey. Within a short period of time, the defendant appeared at the appointed place. The sheriff approached and observed the whiskey on the front seat of the taxicab. The defendant, recognizing the sheriff, backed out and fled down the street. Other police officers, who were trailing him, took up the pursuit. By means of a spotlight, the pursuing officers were able to observe a bottle being thrown from the taxicab about a block from where the defendant was stopped. Returning to the spot where the bottle was thrown out of the taxicab, the officers found a broken Old Crow pint whiskey bottle. The ground where the bottle lay was wet with a liquid identified as whiskey. The seal on the bottle had not been broken.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction and the record discloses no fundamental error. Affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webster v. State
1959 OK CR 47 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Cox v. State
1959 OK CR 7 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Hattensty v. State
1958 OK CR 12 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1956 OK CR 18, 293 P.2d 921, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardwell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1956.