Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Cardwell v. State

Cardwell v. State

200 S.W.3d 559, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2006 WL 2529498
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 5, 2006
DocketED 87086
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W.3d 559 (Cardwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardwell v. State, 200 S.W.3d 559, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2006 WL 2529498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Cardwell (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her Rule 29.15 1 motion to vacate judgment and sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. (2005), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Evans
200 S.W.3d 559 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 S.W.3d 559, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2006 WL 2529498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardwell-v-state-moctapp-2006.