Cardus v. Cardus

268 A.D.2d 402, 701 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 188

This text of 268 A.D.2d 402 (Cardus v. Cardus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardus v. Cardus, 268 A.D.2d 402, 701 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.H.O.), dated September 9, 1998, as, after a nonjury trial, granted the plaintiff a divorce and dismissed his counterclaims.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[403]*403In this long-term marriage, the plaintiff established her entitlement to a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1]; Brady v Brady, 64 NY2d 339). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Brady
476 N.E.2d 290 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 402, 701 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardus-v-cardus-nyappdiv-2000.