Cardullias v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Cardullias v. State

11 So. 2d 572, 152 Fla. 347, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 910

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 2, 1943·Published

Opinion

BUFORD, C. J.:

The appellants were convicted in the court below of the offense of breaking and entering a building of another with the intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny.

The evidence shows that a building had at the time alleged been broken and entered and that property valued at several *348 thousand dollars had then and there been stolen therefrom, but there is absolutely no evidence legally sufficient to even show a guilty knowledge on the part of either of the defendants in connection with such offense.

Judgment is reversed.

So ordered.

BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFORD, C. J.:

The appellants were convicted in the court below of the offense of breaking and entering a building of another with the intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny.

The evidence shows that a building had at the time alleged been broken and entered and that property valued at several *348 thousand dollars had then and there been stolen therefrom, but there is absolutely no evidence legally sufficient to even show a guilty knowledge on the part of either of the defendants in connection with such offense.

Judgment is reversed.

So ordered.

BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Cardullias v. State, 11 So. 2d 572, 152 Fla. 347, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 910 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

11 So. 2d 572 (Cardullias v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.