Cardoza v. Sheiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cardoza v. Sheiner

33 A.D.2d 663, 304 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 663 (Cardoza v. Sheiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardoza v. Sheiner, 33 A.D.2d 663, 304 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered May 14, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the complaint dismissed. In this action against an abutting property owner for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the sidewalk, plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action. The basis of the claim is that in attempting to clear a path immediately after an extremely heavy fall of snow, defendant left the sidewalk in a more dangerous condition than it would have been in if no such effort were made. The proof utterly fails to sustain that contention (Glassman v. City of New York, 1 N Y 2d 712; Bonfrisco v. Marlib Corp., 24 N Y 2d 817; Golub v. City of New York, 201 Misc. 866, affd. 282 App. Div. 666). Moreover, the finding of the jury as to how the accident occurred is against the weight of the credible evidence. Concur — Eager, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered May 14, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the complaint dismissed. In this action against an abutting property owner for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the sidewalk, plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action. The basis of the claim is that in attempting to clear a path immediately after an extremely heavy fall of snow, defendant left the sidewalk in a more dangerous condition than it would have been in if no such effort were made. The proof utterly fails to sustain that contention (Glassman v. City of New York, 1 N Y 2d 712; Bonfrisco v. Marlib Corp., 24 N Y 2d 817; Golub v. City of New York, 201 Misc. 866, affd. 282 App. Div. 666). Moreover, the finding of the jury as to how the accident occurred is against the weight of the credible evidence. Concur — Eager, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 663, 304 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardoza-v-sheiner-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack