Cardox Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
344 U.S. 861, 73 S. Ct. 102
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cardox Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co., 344 U.S. 861, 73 S. Ct. 102 (1952).
344 U.S. 861 (Cardox Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Devex Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
263 F. Supp. 17 (D. Delaware, 1967)
McGah v. VM CORPORATION
166 F. Supp. 662 (N.D. Illinois, 1958)
Calhoun v. J. I. Case Co.
150 F. Supp. 189 (N.D. Ohio, 1957)
Transmirra Products Corp. And Robert Aronstein v. Fourco Glass Co.
233 F.2d 885 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Denis v. Perfect Parts, Inc.
142 F. Supp. 259 (D. Massachusetts, 1956)
Comfort Equipment Co. v. Steckler. Burch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Steckler
212 F.2d 371 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. Igoe
212 F.2d 378 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
S.O.S. Co. v. Bolta Co.
117 F. Supp. 59 (N.D. Illinois, 1953)
Guiberson Corp. v. Garrett Oil Tools, Inc.
205 F.2d 660 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Transmirra Products Corp. v. Magnavox Co.
110 F. Supp. 676 (S.D. New York, 1953)