Cardosanto v. Kaplan
This text of 194 Misc. 725 (Cardosanto v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tenant was entitled to liquidated damages on his counterclaim in the minimum amount of $50 inasmuch as the landlord failed to establish that the rent overcharge was ‘ ‘ neither willful nor the result of failure to take practicable precautions against the occurrence of the violation.” (Housing and Rent Act of 1947, § 205; U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1895.)
The judgment and final order, so far as appealed from, should be unanimously modified upon the law by increasing the amount of the recovery on the counterclaim to $90, together with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Appeal from decision dismissed. No appeal lies therefrom.
Stehstbriitk, Bubenstein and Froessel, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 Misc. 725, 90 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardosanto-v-kaplan-nyappterm-1949.