Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Cardosanto v. Cardosanto

Cardosanto v. Cardosanto

15 Misc. 2d 1001, 186 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2477
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 24, 1958·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was properly brought under subdivision 8 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. Upon due notice of revocation of the license of the occupant, the landlord became entitled to possession of the premises.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for' the landlord as prayed for in the petition, with appropriate costs in the court below. Issuance of warrant stayed to and .including November 30, 1958.

Concur — Pette, Habt and Bbown, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardosanto v. Cardosanto, 15 Misc. 2d 1001, 186 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

15 Misc. 2d 1001 (Cardosanto v. Cardosanto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murawski v. Melkun
71 Misc. 2d 575 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
Brennecke v. Smith
42 Misc. 2d 935 (New York County Courts, 1964)
Tausik v. Tausik
21 Misc. 2d 599 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Tausik v. Tausik
19 Misc. 2d 825 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1959)