Cardone v. Cardone
This text of 246 A.D.2d 619 (Cardone v. Cardone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Eggert, J.H.O.), dated September 10, 1996, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered November 8, 1996, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal amount of $72,500.
Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision {see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
The agreement between the parties was supported by adequate consideration (see, Joab Commercial Laundries v Reeder, 159 AD2d 489, 490). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v 151 E. Post Rd. Corp., 78 NY2d 88, 91; Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, 482). Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D.2d 619, 667 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardone-v-cardone-nyappdiv-1998.