Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cardona v. Scheerer

Cardona v. Scheerer

498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 1986
DocketNo. 85-2032
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 498 So. 2d 553 (Cardona v. Scheerer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardona v. Scheerer, 498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment because we find the trial court erred in not holding that the fifth amended complaint should relate back to the date of filing of the third amended complaint which included the appellee as a named party defendant. See Vantage View, Inc. v. Bali East Development Corp., 421 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We also note that the applicable statute of limitations is Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985) rather than section 95.11(4)(d) which was applied by the trial court. See Ash v. Stella, 457 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1984).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. State
498 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 553, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardona-v-scheerer-fladistctapp-1986.