Cardona v. Commercial Building Maintenance, Inc.
This text of 626 So. 2d 335 (Cardona v. Commercial Building Maintenance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Jairo Cardona appeals the decision of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denying him attorney’s fees and costs. Cardona asserted entitlement to attorney’s fees based on sections 440.34(3)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1989). The standard of review of a JCC’s award or denial of attorney’s fees under section 440.34(3), is whether the findings on which the award or denial is based, are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Palumbo v. Metropolitan Dade County, 465 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). After careful review of the record, we find there is competent, substantial evidence to support the JCC’s finding and hereby affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 So. 2d 335, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11528, 1993 WL 469431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardona-v-commercial-building-maintenance-inc-fladistctapp-1993.