Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00439-CV
CARDIOVASCULAR SPECIALTY APPELLANT ASSOCIATES OF NORTH TEXAS, P.A.
V.
MARK D. HEATH AND SUSAN P. HEATH APPELLEES
----------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------
We have considered appellant’s “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” It is the
court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 4, 2013
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath (Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.