Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 4, 2013·No. 02-12-00439-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00439-CV

CARDIOVASCULAR SPECIALTY APPELLANT ASSOCIATES OF NORTH TEXAS, P.A.

V.

MARK D. HEATH AND SUSAN P. HEATH APPELLEES

----------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------

We have considered appellant’s “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 4, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath (Cardiovascular Specialty Associates of North Texas, P.A. v. Mark D. Heath and Susan P. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.