Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery v. West Florida Regional Medical Center

993 So. 2d 1060, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5082, 2008 WL 916995
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 2008
Docket1D08-0189
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 993 So. 2d 1060 (Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery v. West Florida Regional Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery v. West Florida Regional Medical Center, 993 So. 2d 1060, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5082, 2008 WL 916995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

993 So.2d 1060 (2008)

CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, P.A., Appellant,
v.
WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, d/b/a West Florida Hospital, and Mark R. Dylewski, Appellees.

No. 1D08-0189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 7, 2008.

William R. Mitchell of Wm. Rod Mitchell P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

*1061 Ricardo A. Banciella of Wampler Buchanan Walker Chabrow Banciella & Stanley, P.A., Miami, J. Jeffrey Deery and Andrew T. Dixon of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of an "Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." Because this order merely granted summary judgment in favor of Mark R. Dylewski, without also entering judgment, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss arguing the order is not an appealable partial final judgment. We agree that the order on appeal does not contain sufficient language of finality to unequivocally bring an end to the required judicial labor, and therefore it failed to dispose of the case as to a party. Hoffman v. Hall, 817 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Monticello Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 743 So.2d 1215, at 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Similar to an order granting a motion for summary judgment, an order granting summary judgment, without more, is not a final order. Because the order on appeal did no more than grant summary judgment, the order is not final. Accordingly, we grant the appellee's motion and dismiss this appeal as premature.

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowen, Bowen v. Costello, Waste Pro USA, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Lince v. Pelican Circle Association, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Clay, Clay v. Clay, Teddy Clay Revocable Trust
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Charles Davis v. Bay County Jail, Rick Anglin
238 So. 3d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Carroll v. Watersound Beach Community Ass'n
75 So. 3d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
City of Panama City v. Andina, Inc.
63 So. 3d 908 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Tarik, Inc. v. NNN Acquisitions, Inc.
17 So. 3d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
CITY OF MARCO ISLAND v. Dumas
13 So. 3d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 So. 2d 1060, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5082, 2008 WL 916995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardiothoracic-and-vascular-surgery-v-west-florida-regional-medical-center-fladistctapp-2008.