Cardinell v. Cherundolo, Bottar & Leone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cardinell v. Cherundolo, Bottar & Leone

59 A.D.3d 984, 873 N.Y.S.2d 229

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.3d 984 (Cardinell v. Cherundolo, Bottar & Leone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardinell v. Cherundolo, Bottar & Leone, 59 A.D.3d 984, 873 N.Y.S.2d 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James E Murphy, J), entered January 10, 2008 in a legal malpractice action. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment, granted the cross motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, EJ., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James E Murphy, J), entered January 10, 2008 in a legal malpractice action. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment, granted the cross motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, EJ., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.3d 984, 873 N.Y.S.2d 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardinell-v-cherundolo-bottar-leone-nyappdiv-2009.