Cardinale v. Society of Civility & Labor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cardinale v. Society of Civility & Labor

102 N.Y.S. 471

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.Y.S. 471 (Cardinale v. Society of Civility & Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardinale v. Society of Civility & Labor, 102 N.Y.S. 471 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

It is practically admitted that plaintiff’s intestate had been a member of defendant corporation; that he had been upwards of three months in arrears; that on March 8, 1906, under article 25 of the by-laws, his name had been canceled therefor from the roster of the society; and that he died without formal reinstatement on the 31st of May following. The defendant contends that the plaintiff was therefore not entitled to recover the $100 benefit provided by article 38 or funeral expenses provided by article 40 of the by-laws. Evidence there was, though contradicted, of payment by the intestate, some two weeks prior to his death, to an officer of the corporation of more than the amount of his arrears, of its retention, and then- return after the officer was informed of his demise; and the determination of the trial justice thereon in favor of the plaintiff calls for no interference by this court, for “the law does not favor forfeitures, and sometimes slight acts, with full knowledge of the facts, will be held to be a waiver.” Kehrbaum v. Kegal (Sup.) 40 N. Y. Supp. 589, 591. It may not well be urged that such informal reinstatement would not be within the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, for the preamble to the constitution, as submitted in translation, reads:

“The articles of this constitution are fundamental and incancellable; while the articles of the by-laws may be modified or added to when it occurs, but at the majority of votes of the assembly at ordinary meeting.”

And the financial secretary, reading from the minutes of the meeting at which the name of plaintiff’s intestate was canceled, said:

“In order to better facilitate matters, it was agreed unanimously by the assembly, to facillitate, if one of the members was in arrears and desired to place himself upon a common basis with the society, would not lose the rights granted by the statutes .or by-laws of the society,”

The justice, however, in awarding to the plaintiff the sum of $175, exclusive of costs, awarded more than was established by the evidence; for there was no evidence of funeral of the deceased or of funeral expenses, which, by article 40 of the by-laws, “will not be more than $75.” [473]*473The judgment should therefore be reduced by the sum of $75, and, as thus modified, affirmed.

Judgment reduced by the sum of $75, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

It is practically admitted that plaintiff’s intestate had been a member of defendant corporation; that he had been upwards of three months in arrears; that on March 8, 1906, under article 25 of the by-laws, his name had been canceled therefor from the roster of the society; and that he died without formal reinstatement on the 31st of May following. The defendant contends that the plaintiff was therefore not entitled to recover the $100 benefit provided by article 38 or funeral expenses provided by article 40 of the by-laws. Evidence there was, though contradicted, of payment by the intestate, some two weeks prior to his death, to an officer of the corporation of more than the amount of his arrears, of its retention, and then- return after the officer was informed of his demise; and the determination of the trial justice thereon in favor of the plaintiff calls for no interference by this court, for “the law does not favor forfeitures, and sometimes slight acts, with full knowledge of the facts, will be held to be a waiver.” Kehrbaum v. Kegal (Sup.) 40 N. Y. Supp. 589, 591. It may not well be urged that such informal reinstatement would not be within the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, for the preamble to the constitution, as submitted in translation, reads:

“The articles of this constitution are fundamental and incancellable; while the articles of the by-laws may be modified or added to when it occurs, but at the majority of votes of the assembly at ordinary meeting.”

And the financial secretary, reading from the minutes of the meeting at which the name of plaintiff’s intestate was canceled, said:

“In order to better facilitate matters, it was agreed unanimously by the assembly, to facillitate, if one of the members was in arrears and desired to place himself upon a common basis with the society, would not lose the rights granted by the statutes .or by-laws of the society,”

The justice, however, in awarding to the plaintiff the sum of $175, exclusive of costs, awarded more than was established by the evidence; for there was no evidence of funeral of the deceased or of funeral expenses, which, by article 40 of the by-laws, “will not be more than $75.” [473]*473The judgment should therefore be reduced by the sum of $75, and, as thus modified, affirmed.

Judgment reduced by the sum of $75, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.Y.S. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardinale-v-society-of-civility-labor-nyappterm-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack