Cardinal v. Mercury Insurance Company, John Roshirt
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that there was, on the findings, no disclosure of the true interest of the assured and the policy was void and not subject to reformation. (Lasher v. St. Joseph Fire & Mar. Ins. Co., 86 N. Y. 423; Skinner v. Norman, 165 N. Y. 565, 571. See, also, Commercial Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Crawford, 219 App. Div. 110.) No opinion. (See 266 N. Y. 542.)
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J. Not sitting: Loughran, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
195 N.E. 148 (Cardinal v. Mercury Insurance Company, John Roshirt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.