Cardinal v. C. H. Masland & Sons
This text of 495 P.2d 364 (Cardinal v. C. H. Masland & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[200]*200OPINION ON REHEARING
By the Court,
On the appeal of this case we reversed an order of the district court granting summary judgment to C. H. Masland and Sons in an action commenced by Charles and Theresa Cardinal to cancel a deed of trust and recover partnership real property sold to Masland under foreclosure sale. Cardinal v. C. H. Masland & Sons, 87 Nev. 224, 484 P.2d 1075 (1971), two justices dissenting. We granted rehearing to reconsider that holding. A majority of this court is now of the view that the district court order granting summary judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion on appeal. Accordingly, we overrule our opinion on appeal, and affirm the order of the district court granting summary judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
495 P.2d 364, 88 Nev. 199, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardinal-v-c-h-masland-sons-nev-1972.