Cardin v. State
This text of 151 S.E. 566 (Cardin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The accused was convicted of burglary, and his motion for - a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. Two of his accomplices testified against him, and their testimony was corroborated by other evidence which, independently of the testimony of the accomplices, directly connected him with the crime charged. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 731, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardin-v-state-gactapp-1930.