Cardin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cardin v. State

151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 731, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 668

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cardin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ga. App. 106 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 14, 1930·No. 20171·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The accused was convicted of burglary, and his motion for - a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. Two of his accomplices testified against him, and their testimony was corroborated by other evidence which, independently of the testimony of the accomplices, directly connected him with the crime charged. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

The accused was convicted of burglary, and his motion for - a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. Two of his accomplices testified against him, and their testimony was corroborated by other evidence which, independently of the testimony of the accomplices, directly connected him with the crime charged. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cardin v. State, 151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 731, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 668 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

151 S.E. 566 (Cardin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.