Cardin v. Halpern
247 A.D. 791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On argument, judgment dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ ease reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Under the circumstances shown, the plaintiffs were entitled to amend their complaint; as a matter of reasonable discretion. The nature of the action was not materially changed, but another element of negligence was added. It was error to dismiss the complaint on the grounds stated in the motion made at the close of plaintiffs’ case. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cardin v. Halpern, 247 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 791 (Cardin v. Halpern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parry v. Marlin Firearms Co.
281 A.D. 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)