Cardillo v. Rhode Island Co.
This text of 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 99 (Cardillo v. Rhode Island Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hearing upon a motion for new trial, after verdict of the jury for the defendant November 1, 1917.
In this case the plaintiff claimed to have been sitting in the center of a closed car and that the car stopped suddenly between Shepard and Barton streets in Providence, and that he was injured in his chest. A number of witnesses testified in the ease and, from the testimony, apparently the plaintiff was the only one who suffered any injury, and it seems inconceivable from his own testimony that he could have been injured in.the way he claimed to be.
Motion for new trial denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardillo-v-rhode-island-co-risuperct-1918.