Carder v. Culbertson

100 Mo. 269
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 100 Mo. 269 (Carder v. Culbertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carder v. Culbertson, 100 Mo. 269 (Mo. 1889).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

Ejectment for sixty acres of land in Carroll c.ounty. Plaintiffs were minors when this, their land, was sold for their education, in 1869, by their curator, under an order, made by the probate court for the sale of the land at public vendue. The land was appraised at one hundred and fifty dollars, and sold for ten dollars to Wm. H. Long; six years thereafter he sold by warranty deed to Andrew Heudricks for three thousand dollars. In April, 1884, Hendricks conveyed by like deed for same consideration to defendant.

By stipulation filed it is agreed that the sole question to be determined is whether the curator’s deed is valid. There can be no hesitation on this point; it is a plain matter of statutory provision. Sections 28, 29 and 30, page 469, General Statutes, 1865, control this case.

The last-named section declares: “No real estate of any minor, sold under the provisions of this chapter, shall be sold for less than three-fourths of its appraised value,” etc. The probate court had no jurisdiction to approve such a sale. Its order of approval was, therefore, coram non judice, and the deed showing the facts already recited was void on its face.

We reverse , the judgment and remand the cause with directions to enter a judgment for plaintiffs, after having taken an account of rents and profits.

All concur, but Barclay, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. Floyd
492 S.W.2d 865 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)
Texier v. Texier
119 S.W.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
Morris v. Karr
114 S.W.2d 962 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
Bopst v. Williams
229 S.W. 796 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)
Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.
1916 OK 992 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Miller v. Staggs
187 S.W. 1159 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Mo. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carder-v-culbertson-mo-1889.