Cardenas v.Curtain

230 A.D.2d 702, 646 N.Y.S.2d 455

This text of 230 A.D.2d 702 (Cardenas v.Curtain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardenas v.Curtain, 230 A.D.2d 702, 646 N.Y.S.2d 455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Hernán Cardenas appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated November 28, 1995, as granted the motion for summary judgment made by the defendants in Action No. 1.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There are questions of fact which preclude summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; see also, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 [b] [2]; Campbell v City of Elmira, 84 NY2d 505; Klayman v City of New York, 130 AD2d 551; cf., Martinez v City of New York, 213 AD2d 704).

Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. City of Elmira
644 N.E.2d 993 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Klayman v. City of New York
130 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Martinez v. City of New York
213 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D.2d 702, 646 N.Y.S.2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardenas-vcurtain-nyappdiv-1996.