Cardenas General Merchandise, LLC, Dominga Cardenas, and Juan G. Castillo v. Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc. as Assignee of Cano & Sons Trucking, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2025
Docket13-24-00488-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Cardenas General Merchandise, LLC, Dominga Cardenas, and Juan G. Castillo v. Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc. as Assignee of Cano & Sons Trucking, LLC (Cardenas General Merchandise, LLC, Dominga Cardenas, and Juan G. Castillo v. Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc. as Assignee of Cano & Sons Trucking, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cardenas General Merchandise, LLC, Dominga Cardenas, and Juan G. Castillo v. Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc. as Assignee of Cano & Sons Trucking, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-24-00488-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

CARDENAS GENERAL MERCHANDISE, LLC, DOMINGA CARDENAS, AND JUAN G. CASTILLO, Appellants,

v.

BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. AS ASSIGNEE OF CANO & SONS TRUCKING, LLC, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE 139TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.

The parties have negotiated a settlement resolving the issues in this appeal, and

appellants now request that this appeal be dismissed.

The Court, having considered appellants’ unopposed motion, is of the opinion that

the unopposed motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore,

appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

The costs are taxed against the appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

JAIME TIJERINA Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 13th day of March, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cardenas General Merchandise, LLC, Dominga Cardenas, and Juan G. Castillo v. Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc. as Assignee of Cano & Sons Trucking, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardenas-general-merchandise-llc-dominga-cardenas-and-juan-g-castillo-texapp-2025.