Carden v. Vanderslice

336 So. 2d 1082, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1767
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 13, 1976·No. SC 1600·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

The trial court ordered a 60-acre tract, owned jointly by 18 individuals as tenants in common, sold for division on the ground that the land could not be equitably divided in kind. We affirm.

The plaintiffs had the burden to prove that a fair and equitable partition of the land could not be made. We find that they sustained their burden by proof, especially in view of the presumption in favor of the trial court’s findings since he saw and heard the witnesses. Meador v. Meador, 255 Ala. 688, 53 So.2d 546 (1951).

The record shows that attempts at division were made before the suit was filed, without success. Also, the nature of the terrain, the location of improvements and roads on the land and the number of interests — some owning one-fifth, others, one-fortieth — are facts which support the trial court’s finding that equitable division in kind could not be accomplished.

AFFIRMED.

FAULKNER, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carden v. Vanderslice, 336 So. 2d 1082, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1767 (Ala. 1976).

336 So. 2d 1082 (Carden v. Vanderslice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Cruz
Superior Court of Guam, 2023
Estate of Alfonso Francisco Escamilla
Superior Court of Guam, 2019
Barrow v. Myhand
205 So. 3d 1261 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
Steadman v. Uptown Motors, Inc.
842 So. 2d 684 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Ragland v. Walker
411 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
English v. Brantley
361 So. 2d 549 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1978)