Carden v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
This text of 134 S.E.2d 879 (Carden v. Liberty Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The claimant’s testimony, the only evidence offered to prove notice of accident as required by Code § 114-303, was equivocal, vague and contradictory and showed that no notice of injury from the accident was given at all. Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the finding of the director, that the notice required was not given, was unsupported by the evidence. See Royal Indem. Co. v. Coulter, 213 Ga. 277 (98 SE2d 899); Employer’s Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Holloway, 98 Ga. App. 265 (105 SE2d 370); Kresge v. Holley, 104 Ga. App. 144 (121 SE2d 182).
2. In view of the above ruling, it is unnecessary to pass upon the other questions argued upon appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E.2d 879, 108 Ga. App. 829, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carden-v-liberty-mutual-insurance-gactapp-1964.