Carden v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carden v. Director of Revenue

492 S.W.3d 669, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 646, 2016 WL 3538561

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2016·No. WD 78189·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John Carden appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining the administrative suspension of his driving privileges under section 302.536. He contends that his blood alcohol test result was improperly admitted into evidence without the necessary foundation as promulgated by 19 CSR 25-30.070; therefore, the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John Carden appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining the administrative suspension of his driving privileges under section 302.536. He contends that his blood alcohol test result was improperly admitted into evidence without the necessary foundation as promulgated by 19 CSR 25-30.070; therefore, the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carden v. Director of Revenue, 492 S.W.3d 669, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 646, 2016 WL 3538561 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

492 S.W.3d 669 (Carden v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.