Cardell v. Lawton

16 Vt. 606
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 15, 1844·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The petition should not only have contained the names of the witnesses from whom the newly discovered evidence was expected, and the statement of what that testimony was expected to be, but also the affidavits of the witnesses, stating what their testimony would be; and the new trial, if granted at all, must be granted upon the new discovered evidence thus stated in the petition, and could not be granted upon newly discovered evidence shown at the hearing, unless stated in the petition. For this cause the petition in this case must be dismissed.

It is sufficient to produce the minutes of the judge who presided at the trial, or a copy of them, on the hearing upon the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardell v. Lawton, 16 Vt. 606 (Vt. 1844).

16 Vt. 606 (Cardell v. Lawton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. Warrick
2 A.2d 273 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1938)
Soebel v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
83 N.E. 3 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Bradish v. State
35 Vt. 452 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1862)