Cardel Salmon-Mair v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 2014·No. 14-4159·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CARDEL SALMON-MAIR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-4159

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION AND IOWA COLLEGE ACQUISITION CORP.,

Appellees.

_____________________________/ Opinion filed October 21, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the State of Florida, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

Cardel Salmon-Mair, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, and Louis A. Gutierrez, Assistant Court Chief, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has sought review of an order vacating a decision of the appeals referee based on the referee’s failure to afford the employer due process of law and remanding the matter to the referee for further proceedings and rendition of a new

decision. Because the order on appeal does not bring the administrative adjudicative process to a close, it is not a final administrative order. See Hill v. Division of Retirement, 687 So. 2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Consequently, this appeal is premature. Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, filed on September 15, 2014, is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. WOLF, BENTON, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardel Salmon-Mair v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Cardel Salmon-Mair v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission (Cardel Salmon-Mair v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Division of Retirement
687 So. 2d 1376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)