Cardeb Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Cardeb Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 923

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1967

DocketNo. R67/105; No. R67/106

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 923 (Cardeb Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardeb Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 923 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in Kurt Orban Company, Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f .o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in Kurt Orban Company, Inc. v. United States (52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f .o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardeb-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.