Cardamona v. Hartigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cardamona v. Hartigan

272 A.D.2d 825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 825 (Cardamona v. Hartigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardamona v. Hartigan, 272 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses, resulting from a collision between an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding as passengers and one operated by defendant, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, error was committed by the trial court in its refusal to charge as requested that there could be no recovery by the plaintiffs if the jury should find that the accident occurred in the south lane of the road. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses, resulting from a collision between an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding as passengers and one operated by defendant, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, error was committed by the trial court in its refusal to charge as requested that there could be no recovery by the plaintiffs if the jury should find that the accident occurred in the south lane of the road. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardamona-v-hartigan-nyappdiv-1947.