Card v. Sunbeam-Oster Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Card v. Sunbeam-Oster Co.

216 A.D.2d 814, 628 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 814 (Card v. Sunbeam-Oster Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Card v. Sunbeam-Oster Co., 216 A.D.2d 814, 628 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Rose, J.), entered June 3, 1994 in Tioga County, which, inter alia, conditionally granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens.

We agree with Supreme Court’s well-reasoned decision to conditionally grant defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens and, further, reject plaintiff’s assertion that such motions were barred by laches. The parties’ remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Rose, J.), entered June 3, 1994 in Tioga County, which, inter alia, conditionally granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens.

We agree with Supreme Court’s well-reasoned decision to conditionally grant defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens and, further, reject plaintiff’s assertion that such motions were barred by laches. The parties’ remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 814, 628 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/card-v-sunbeam-oster-co-nyappdiv-1995.