Card v. Cargor

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided September 3, 2025·No. 4:24-cv-12452·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT G. CARD,

Petitioner, CASE NO. 4:24-CV-12452 HON. F. KAY BEHM v. U. S. District Judge

KIM CARGOR,

Respondent. ___________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT THE MOTION FOR PAUPER STATUS ON APPEAL (ECF No. 14)

Petitioner Robert G. Card filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, through counsel Robert J. Dunn. This Court denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, declined to issue a certificate of appealability, but granted Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Card v. Cargor, No. 4:24-CV- 12452, 2025 WL 1739369, at *1 (E.D. Mich. June 23, 2025). Petitioner has now filed a Notice of Appeal. (ECF No. 10). Petitioner also filed a motion for pauper status on appeal. (ECF No. 14). This Court already granted Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis, it is thus unnecessary for Petitioner to again obtain permission to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Petitioner’s current motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. See McMillan v. McKune, 16 F. App’x 896, 897 (10th Cir. 2001). According, it is ordered that the motion for pauper status (ECF No. 14) is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 3, 2025 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Card v. Cargor, (E.D. Mich. 2025).

Card v. Cargor (Card v. Cargor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMillan v. McKune
16 F. App'x 896 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)