Carcaba v. Carcaba

80 So. 574, 76 Fla. 624
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1919
StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 574 (Carcaba v. Carcaba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carcaba v. Carcaba, 80 So. 574, 76 Fla. 624 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

This appeal is from a decree allowing an injunction pendente lite restraining appellants from [625]*625prosecuting an action of unlawful entry and detainer in the Court of the County Judge of St. Johns County. The bill of complaint is not without equity to support the restraining order; and as under the allegations of the bill proofs may be made entitling the complainants to relief, the interlocutory order appealed from is affirmed. See Hobbs v. Chamberlain, 55 Fla. 661, 45 South. Rep. 988; Smith v. Love, 49 Fla. 230, 38 South. Rep. 376; Shad v. Smith, 74 Fla. 324, 76 South. Rep. 897.

Affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Love
38 So. 376 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Hobbs v. Chamberlain
45 So. 988 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Shad v. Smith
76 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 574, 76 Fla. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carcaba-v-carcaba-fla-1919.