Carcaba v. Carcaba

80 So. 574, 76 Fla. 624
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 9, 1919·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

This appeal is from a decree allowing an injunction pendente lite restraining appellants from [625] prosecuting an action of unlawful entry and detainer in the Court of the County Judge of St. Johns County. The bill of complaint is not without equity to support the restraining order; and as under the allegations of the bill proofs may be made entitling the complainants to relief, the interlocutory order appealed from is affirmed. See Hobbs v. Chamberlain, 55 Fla. 661, 45 South. Rep. 988; Smith v. Love, 49 Fla. 230, 38 South. Rep. 376; Shad v. Smith, 74 Fla. 324, 76 South. Rep. 897.

Affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carcaba v. Carcaba, 80 So. 574, 76 Fla. 624 (Fla. 1919).

80 So. 574 (Carcaba v. Carcaba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Love
49 Fla. 230 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Hobbs v. Chamberlain
55 Fla. 661 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Shad v. Smith
76 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)