Carborundum Co. v. Coe
122 F.2d 36, 74 App. D.C. 199, 50 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 648, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900
This text of 122 F.2d 36 (Carborundum Co. v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carborundum Co. v. Coe, 122 F.2d 36, 74 App. D.C. 199, 50 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 648, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900 (D.C. Cir. 1941).
Opinion
We are satisfied that the claims here involved fail to reveal anything which approaches the dignity of invention. The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 F.2d 36, 74 App. D.C. 199, 50 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 648, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carborundum-co-v-coe-cadc-1941.