Carborundum Co. v. Coe
122 F.2d 36, 74 App. D.C. 199, 50 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 648, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900
Opinion
We are satisfied that the claims here involved fail to reveal anything which approaches the dignity of invention. The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carborundum Co. v. Coe, 122 F.2d 36, 74 App. D.C. 199, 50 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 648, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900 (D.C. Cir. 1941).
122 F.2d 36 (Carborundum Co. v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.