Carbone v. Visco

115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55310
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 948 (Carbone v. Visco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carbone v. Visco, 115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint holding that the Insurance Law does not require that an injured motorcyclist sustain a "serious injury” as a prerequisite for recovery for noneconomic loss resulting from a collision with a motor vehicle owned by defendant Noemi Visco and driven by defendant Roselena Visco.

An injured motorcyclist is not a "covered person” as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (j). Consequently, he is not entitled to first-party benefits under the statute (Insurance Law § 5103 [a] [1]). While a motorcyclist is required to maintain liability insurance under the financial security provisions of the Insurance Law, first-party benefits under such policy run only to pedestrians since the statute provides for first-party benefits to persons "other than the occupants of such motorcycle, another motorcycle, or any motor vehicle, for loss arising out of the use or operation of the motorcycle” (Insurance Law § 5103 [f]).

While plaintiff’s status as a noncovered person deprives him of the right to recover first-party benefits under the Insurance Law, he nonetheless is entitled to pursue his common-law remedies in an action against defendants as owner and operator of a motor vehicle involved in the accident. Under these circumstances, he is not required to comply with the "serious injury” provision of Insurance Law § 5104. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.—summary [949]*949judgment.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sterling v. Diaz
2024 NY Slip Op 51506(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2024)
Mountainside v. Vt Mutual Ins
Vermont Superior Court, 2024
Jung v. Glover
2019 NY Slip Op 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
BOYSON, KAREN v. KWASOWSKY, IRENE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Boyson v. Kwasowsky
129 A.D.3d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Rinaldo v. McCormick
139 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbone-v-visco-nyappdiv-1985.