Carbone v. State

615 So. 2d 282, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3788, 1993 WL 80617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1993·No. No. 92-0924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the legality of his sentence as an habitual felony offender, following his plea of guilty, because the trial court failed to make the findings mandated by section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). We find this error to be harmless. See State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We also find we lack jurisdiction to review the suppression issue since the appellant subsequently entered a plea of guilty. Our ruling, however, is without prejudice to the appellant on remand to seek to withdraw his plea since it appears that it may have been entered by mistake. See Ross v. State, 566 So.2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carbone v. State, 615 So. 2d 282, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3788, 1993 WL 80617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

615 So. 2d 282 (Carbone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barther v. State
674 So. 2d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Herrington v. State
622 So. 2d 1339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)