Carbone v. Horstman
This text of 19 A.D.2d 553 (Carbone v. Horstman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injury, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 8, 1963 after a pretrial conference, which granted a preference in trial. Order reversed, without costs; preference vacated; and action restored to its regular position on the calendar. The record fails to show an adequate basis for the granting of a preference (Engongoro v. Bi Palma, 17 A D 2d 985). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A.D.2d 553, 242 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbone-v-horstman-nyappdiv-1963.