Carbondale School District v. Hourigan

110 A. 173, 267 Pa. 154, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 827
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 12, 1920
DocketAppeal, No. 226
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 110 A. 173 (Carbondale School District v. Hourigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carbondale School District v. Hourigan, 110 A. 173, 267 Pa. 154, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 827 (Pa. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

At the time the court below entered judgment for the defendant on the pleadings the action stood against him as receiver and trustee in bankruptcy. He had been sued in one action in both capacities, and the judgment was on the record as it then stood. The court below is not to be convicted of error because of an amendment to the record made after it reached this court. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion in pursuance of which it was entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theobald, G. v. R.H. Kuhn Company
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
McGregor Estate v. Young Township
38 A.2d 313 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Taylor v. Stanley Co. of America
158 A. 157 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A. 173, 267 Pa. 154, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbondale-school-district-v-hourigan-pa-1920.