Carbondale School District v. Hourigan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Carbondale School District v. Hourigan

110 A. 173, 267 Pa. 154, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 827

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 1920·No. Appeal, No. 226·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

At the time the court below entered judgment for the defendant on the pleadings the action stood against him as receiver and trustee in bankruptcy. He had been sued in one action in both capacities, and the judgment was on the record as it then stood. The court below is not to be convicted of error because of an amendment to the record made after it reached this court. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion in pursuance of which it was entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

At the time the court below entered judgment for the defendant on the pleadings the action stood against him as receiver and trustee in bankruptcy. He had been sued in one action in both capacities, and the judgment was on the record as it then stood. The court below is not to be convicted of error because of an amendment to the record made after it reached this court. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion in pursuance of which it was entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Carbondale School District v. Hourigan, 110 A. 173, 267 Pa. 154, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 827 (Pa. 1920).

Pincite

110 A. 173 (Carbondale School District v. Hourigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related