Carbon Activation U.S. Inc. v. General Carbon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carbon Activation U.S. Inc. v. General Carbon Corp.

265 A.D.2d 363, 696 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 363 (Carbon Activation U.S. Inc. v. General Carbon Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carbon Activation U.S. Inc. v. General Carbon Corp., 265 A.D.2d 363, 696 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, conversion, and fraud, the plaintiff and the defendants on the counterclaim appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme [364]*364Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated June 15, 1998, which, inter alia, denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the counterclaim asserted by the defendant Cornelius Jakobus DuPlessis as alleged that he assigned his rights to a certain invention to the plaintiff under duress, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated December 9, 1998, which denied their motion for reargument and granted the motion of the defendant Cornelius Jakobus DuPlessis for leave to amend his answer to assert a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated December 9, 1998, as denied the appellants’ motion for reargument is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeals are otherwise dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated June 14, 1999. Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, conversion, and fraud, the plaintiff and the defendants on the counterclaim appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme [364]*364Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated June 15, 1998, which, inter alia, denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the counterclaim asserted by the defendant Cornelius Jakobus DuPlessis as alleged that he assigned his rights to a certain invention to the plaintiff under duress, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated December 9, 1998, which denied their motion for reargument and granted the motion of the defendant Cornelius Jakobus DuPlessis for leave to amend his answer to assert a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated December 9, 1998, as denied the appellants’ motion for reargument is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeals are otherwise dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated June 14, 1999. Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 363, 696 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbon-activation-us-inc-v-general-carbon-corp-nyappdiv-1999.