Carbin v. City of New York
This text of 276 A.D.2d 980 (Carbin v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Sneed, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: No actionable negligence on the part of defendant was proved. The cases of Wilson v. Jaybro Realty & Development Co. (289 N. Y. 410) and Loughran v. City of New York (298 N. Y. 320) presented instances of holes in sidewalk or footpath pavement resulting from failure to properly maintain such sidewalk or path. The Court of Appeals consistently has held that a slight difference in elevation of adjoining slabs or flagstones of a sidewalk does not of itself present actionable negligence on the part of the municipality. (Lynch v. City of Beacon, 295 N. Y. 872; Dowd v. City of Buffalo, 290 N. Y. 895.) In this climate, where walks are subject to heaving by frost, that rule is entirely reasonable, and should here be applied in the absence of any proof of negligence upon the part of the municipality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbin-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.