Carbin v. City of New York

276 A.D.2d 980

Opinion

Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Sneed, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: No actionable negligence on the part of defendant was proved. The cases of Wilson v. Jaybro Realty & Development Co. (289 N. Y. 410) and Loughran v. City of New York (298 N. Y. 320) presented instances of holes in sidewalk or footpath pavement resulting from failure to properly maintain such sidewalk or path. The Court of Appeals consistently has held that a slight difference in elevation of adjoining slabs or flagstones of a sidewalk does not of itself present actionable negligence on the part of the municipality. (Lynch v. City of Beacon, 295 N. Y. 872; Dowd v. City of Buffalo, 290 N. Y. 895.) In this climate, where walks are subject to heaving by frost, that rule is entirely reasonable, and should here be applied in the absence of any proof of negligence upon the part of the municipality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carbin v. City of New York, 276 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

276 A.D.2d 980 (Carbin v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loughran v. City of New York
83 N.E.2d 136 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Lynch v. City of Beacon
67 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Dowd v. City of Buffalo
50 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Wilson v. Jaybro Realty & Development Co.
46 N.E.2d 497 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)