Carberry v. Dorschug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carberry v. Dorschug

260 A.D. 992, 24 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5716

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1940·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. Motion to strike out original complaint and all references thereto from brief of appellant granted. (The order denies the motion of defendant First National Bank of Mexico for judgment on the pleadings in an action to impress an equitable lien upon property owned by defendant Alfred H. Dorschug.) Present — Crosby, P. J'., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. Motion to strike out original complaint and all references thereto from brief of appellant granted. (The order denies the motion of defendant First National Bank of Mexico for judgment on the pleadings in an action to impress an equitable lien upon property owned by defendant Alfred H. Dorschug.) Present — Crosby, P. J'., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Carberry v. Dorschug, 260 A.D. 992, 24 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 992 (Carberry v. Dorschug) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.