Carberry v. Dorschug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carberry v. Dorschug

260 A.D. 992, 24 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 992 (Carberry v. Dorschug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carberry v. Dorschug, 260 A.D. 992, 24 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. Motion to strike out original complaint and all references thereto from brief of appellant granted. (The order denies the motion of defendant First National Bank of Mexico for judgment on the pleadings in an action to impress an equitable lien upon property owned by defendant Alfred H. Dorschug.) Present — Crosby, P. J'., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. Motion to strike out original complaint and all references thereto from brief of appellant granted. (The order denies the motion of defendant First National Bank of Mexico for judgment on the pleadings in an action to impress an equitable lien upon property owned by defendant Alfred H. Dorschug.) Present — Crosby, P. J'., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 992, 24 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carberry-v-dorschug-nyappdiv-1940.