Carberry v. Bonilla

65 A.D.2d 613, 409 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13302
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1978·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Weinfurt appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 11, 1977, which denied his motion for a protective order vacating plaintiff’s notice to take deposition upon oral examination. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 15 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. "Absent a showing of hardship, the nonresidence of a defendant does not preclude an examination in the county where the action is pending” (Gazerwitz v Adrian, 28 AD2d 556, 557; Cooper v Met Merchandising, 54 AD2d 859). At bar, the motion for a protective order was based solely upon the affirmation of the attorney for the appellant, and did not state any facts to support the conclusory assertion of hardship. We also note that no objection was taken to the place of the examination, which ordinarily would be Suffolk County and not Nassau County. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carberry v. Bonilla, 65 A.D.2d 613, 409 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

65 A.D.2d 613 (Carberry v. Bonilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nimkoff v. Central Park Plaza Associates, LLC
123 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Boylin v. Eagle Telephonics
130 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Rattner v. Planning Commission of Village of Pleasantville
110 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)