Caraway v. Walker

247 A.D.2d 675, 668 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 967
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 675 (Caraway v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caraway v. Walker, 247 A.D.2d 675, 668 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons after a search uncovered two sharpened ice-pick-type instruments taped under the bars of petitioner’s cell. Petitioner contends that the record does not support the determination. [676]*676We disagree. The detailed misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officers who participated in the search and the photograph of weapons constitute substantial evidence in support of the determination (see, Matter of Brown v Coombe, 241 AD2d 644). Although petitioner denied that the weapons were his, we note that an inference of possession arises whenever weapons are found in an area under an inmate’s control (see, Matter of Emmons v Selsky, 240 AD2d 786; Matter of Mitchell v Coombe, 238 AD2d 648). In any event, petitioner’s contention presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Emmons v Selsky, supra). Petitioner’s remaining claim of Hearing Officer bias has been examined and found to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Goord
293 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Valdes v. Selsky
269 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ebanks v. Goord
263 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Figueroa v. Lacy
260 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Williams v. Selsky
257 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 675, 668 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caraway-v-walker-nyappdiv-1998.