Carattini Vs. Ramey
This text of 471 P.3d 78 (Carattini Vs. Ramey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FELIX ABRAHAM CARATTINI, No. 79884 Appellant, vs. CHRISTI LEE RAMEY, AN INDIVIDUAL, AS MANAGING MEMBER OF FAC INVENTIONS ENTERPRISES LLC; JASON H. HAIR, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS INVESTOR FILED AND STRATEGY CONSULTANT FOR FAC INVENTIONS ENTERPRISES, SEP 1 1 2020 LLC; JULI A. LANDER, AN CIIIKTFEM SUPtr:-FacrouRT INDIVIDUAL AND AS INVESTOR IN BY a.\ii FAC INVENTIONS ENTERPRISES, pt ry
LLC; MARCIA LYNN CORNWELL, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND AS INVESTOR AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF FAC INVENTIONS ENTERPRISES, LLC; AND DR. CRAIG ANTHONY RAMEY, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS INVESTOR IN FAC INVENTIONS ENTERPRISES, LLC, Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Counsel for appellant has filed a "Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal." In the notice, counsel indicates that appellant has passed away. Counsel states that he has been in contact with the executor of appellant's estate, Dolores Delgado, and that Ms. Delgado has indicated that the estate would like to withdraw the appeal, and the estate consents to a voluntary dismissal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. It is so ORDERED.
SUPREME COURT P C.J. OF NEVADA
0 - 335 cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas King & Russo, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
10) 1947A 2 2k"•
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 P.3d 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carattini-vs-ramey-nev-2020.