Caras v. George Comfort & Sons, Inc.

2024 NY Slip Op 02585
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2024
DocketIndex No. 152645/15 Appeal No. 2238-2239 Case No. 2023-05405, 2023-06799
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 02585 (Caras v. George Comfort & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caras v. George Comfort & Sons, Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op 02585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Caras v George Comfort & Sons, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 02585)
Caras v George Comfort & Sons, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 02585
Decided on May 09, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 09, 2024
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Index No. 152645/15 Appeal No. 2238-2239 Case No. 2023-05405, 2023-06799

[*1]Keith Caras, Plaintiff,

v

George Comfort & Sons, Inc., et al., Defendants. George Comfort & Sons, Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,


Cullen and Dykman LLP, New York (Christopher E. Ruggiero of counsel), for appellants.

London Fischer LLP, New York (James Walsh of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas W. Moyne, J.), entered October 30, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted third-party defendant's motion to dismiss third-party plaintiffs' claim for contractual indemnification against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries on October 22, 2012, when he stepped into a lift and slipped on debris. The court properly dismissed third-party plaintiffs' contractual indemnification claim, given that plaintiff's accident did not arise out of work "originating from, incident to, or having connection with" third-party defendant's work so as to trigger the parties' indemnification clause (see Worth Constr. Co., Inc. v Admiral Ins. Co., 10 NY3d 411, 415 [2008]; see also Basile v Legacy Yards Tenant LP, 205 AD3d 531, 531 [1st Dept 2022]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 9, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dibrino v. Rockefeller Ctr. North, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 03558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 02585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caras-v-george-comfort-sons-inc-nyappdiv-2024.