Caranza Steen v. Walter E. Craven
393 F.2d 785, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7555
This text of 393 F.2d 785 (Caranza Steen v. Walter E. Craven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Caranza Steen v. Walter E. Craven, 393 F.2d 785, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7555 (9th Cir. 1968).
Opinion
Walter E. Craven, Warden, is substituted for Robert A. Heinze, Warden, as appellee herein.
A notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the entry of judgment, as required by Rule 73(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This court is accordingly without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal which is, therefore,
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
393 F.2d 785, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caranza-steen-v-walter-e-craven-ca9-1968.