Carameta v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.
28 A.D.2d 636, 282 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4231
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1967
StatusPublished
This text of 28 A.D.2d 636 (Carameta v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carameta v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc., 28 A.D.2d 636, 282 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).
Opinion
Memorandum: We find the monetary award of the jury to be excessive in the light of the proof of plaintiff’s damages. (Appeal from order of. Erie Trial Term denying motion to set aside verdict in a negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 636, 282 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carameta-v-seneca-steel-service-inc-nyappdiv-1967.