Caramelli v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Caramelli v. United States

281 F. 1019, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 30, 1922

DocketNo. 2997

StatusPublished

This text of 281 F. 1019 (Caramelli v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caramelli v. United States, 281 F. 1019, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204 (7th Cir. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a decree closing premises owned and occupied by appellant and enjoining the further maintenance of a nuisance thereon, all pursuant to section 22, title 2, National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314). No assignment of error is presented that has not been decided adversely to appellant in one or more of the many similar cases we have decided during the last few months. The record has also been examined to ascertain whether the evidence supports the decree. Satisfied that it does, we find no reversible error. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a decree closing premises owned and occupied by appellant and enjoining the further maintenance of a nuisance thereon, all pursuant to section 22, title 2, National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314). No assignment of error is presented that has not been decided adversely to appellant in one or more of the many similar cases we have decided during the last few months. The record has also been examined to ascertain whether the evidence supports the decree. Satisfied that it does, we find no reversible error. The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 F. 1019, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caramelli-v-united-states-ca7-1922.