Caragol v. Florida Department of Transportation
450 So. 2d 296, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12966
Opinion
We affirm the judgment under review upon a holding that the jury’s verdict expressly finding the defendant-appellee not negligent rendered harmless the error, if any, in the court’s instructions pertaining to the comparative negligence of the plaintiff. Swindell v. Hellkamp, 242 So.2d 708 (Fla.1970); McArthur v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, 306 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Accord, Zerwal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 332 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caragol v. Florida Department of Transportation, 450 So. 2d 296, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12966 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
450 So. 2d 296 (Caragol v. Florida Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zerwal v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
332 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Swindell v. Hellkamp
242 So. 2d 708 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
McArthur v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
306 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)