Caradonna v. Caradonna

Missouri Court of Appeals

Caradonna v. Caradonna

390 S.W.3d 262, 2013 WL 326956, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 118

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. ED 97833·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen Sansone Caradonna (Wife) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to Thomas Caradon-na (Husband). On appeal, Wife contends the trial court erred in its calculation of maintenance and in its division of property and debt. We do not find the court abused its discretion in its calculation of maintenance or in its division of property and debt. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen Sansone Caradonna (Wife) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to Thomas Caradon-na (Husband). On appeal, Wife contends the trial court erred in its calculation of maintenance and in its division of property and debt. We do not find the court abused its discretion in its calculation of maintenance or in its division of property and debt. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Caradonna v. Caradonna, 390 S.W.3d 262, 2013 WL 326956, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

390 S.W.3d 262 (Caradonna v. Caradonna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.